The scientists at the National Center for Cognitive Informatics and Decision Making (NCCD) have given a lot of thought to this definition. Let’s look at those three key concepts - useful, usable, and satisfying - that make up usability for an electronic health record (EHR).
Useful – How well does the system support the work you’re trying to do? A system is useful if it can perform the functions necessary to get the job done. It’s that simple.
Usable – Is it easy to learn, easy to use, and error-tolerant? You’d expect “usable” to be a part of Usability, right? But in this case, usable is a measurable concept and each of the subcomponents can be measured precisely:
Satisfying – No, not the satisfaction you get from eating a good meal, but the satisfaction of a job well done. This is a subjective feeling, admittedly, but very important if an EHR is to succeed in the workplace. Does the user like using the system? Does he or she feel that it’s a useful tool for their daily work? Or do they just dread having to enter data in the EHR? If so, it won’t be a satisfying experience – and no one would say that EHR was usable.
For more information see TURF- Toward a unified framework of EHR usabilityPlease note:The content provided here are intended as guidelines (recommended, but not mandatory) for design and implementation, not as standards (mandatory, minimum requirements).