Skip to Content
SBMI Horizontal Logo

NCCD Minimize Memory Load Menu

Minimize Memory Load

Please use these links to move easily from one guideline to another.

Consistency Visiblity Match Minimalism Memory Feedback Flexibility
Error Messages Prevent Errors Closure Undo Language Control Help
Return to General Design Principles Index

Users should be given prompt and informative feedback about their actions.

Users should be informed of the system status that results from their actions. The system status include:

  • the user’s location within the system,
  • the progress towards completion, or
  • time needed for a task to be completed, etc.

Presenting status information to users facilitates their next actions and should improve operating efficiency. Figure 1 shows an example of providing feedback on users’ location by “breadcrumb” navigation. It presents the user with the information needed to understand where they are in the system and to how perform further actions. 

an example of providing feedback on users’ location Figure 1: 

In this example, the “breadcrumb” navigation serves as a dynamic location indicator to inform users their location within the EHR.

Alerts are an important type of feedback that should be given by the system when users’ actions are incorrect or have good likelihood of causing errors. The appropriate use of alerts can greatly reduce the potential of errors. The representation of alerts should follow "Good error messages” principles. Whenever presenting alerts, make sure the messages are expressed in plain language, precisely indicate the problem, and constructively suggest a solution. Figure 2 shows a good example of alert, which succinct reason for the alert, as well as a list of actions to respond to the alert.

a good example of alert feedback

Figure 2:

In this good feedback example, the user who orders warfarin for a patient who is already taking aspirin is given an alert warning about the warfarin-aspirin interaction. The rationale for the alert and action choices are also enumerated.

Guidelines summary:

Status information feedback

  • Provide feedback on user’s location. [2] Usability.gov 7:4
  • Provide feedback when users must wait. [2] Usability.gov 2:10
  • Warn of ‘Time Outs’. [2] Usability.gov 2:7
  • Show users the time that content was last updated, not the computer-generated current time. [1] Nielsen’s 106
  • Allow link colors to show visited and unvisited states. [1] Nielsen’s 37
  • Use Site Maps. [2] Usability.gov 7:10
  • Breadcrumb Navigation. [2] Usability.gov 7:12

Alert feedback

Please note:The content provided here are intended as guidelines (recommended, but not mandatory) for design and implementation, not as standards (mandatory, minimum requirements). 

References:

[1] Nielsen J. 113 design guidelines for homepage usability. 2001; Available from:www.nngroup.com/articles/113-design-guidelines-homepage-usability.

[2] U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. The Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines, Enlarged/Expanded edition. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2006. Available from: https://www.usability.gov/.

[3] Microsoft. Microsoft Health Common User Interface design guidance. 2012; Available to download from:  https://archive.codeplex.com/?p=mscui. (Design Guidance - Find a Patient PDF).

[4] Lowry SZ, Quinn MT, Ramaiah M, Brick D, Patterson ES, Zhang J, et al. A human factors guide to enhance EHR usability of critical user interactions when supporting pediatric patient care. The National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2012.

SHARPC Logo